1996 Dodge Ram vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Ram | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2490 mm |