1996 Dodge Ram vs. 2008 MG ZR
To start off, 2008 MG ZR is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 MG ZR weights approximately 123 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 MG ZR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 MG ZR. (174 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 MG ZR.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 2008 MG ZR | |
Make | Dodge | MG |
Model | Ram | ZR |
Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5200 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 159 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 174 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1062 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2510 mm |