1996 Dodge Ram vs. 2008 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2008 Subaru Forester is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Subaru Forester weights approximately 571 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Because 2008 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Dodge Ram. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Subaru Forester. (306 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Subaru Forester.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 2008 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Dodge | Subaru |
Model | Ram | Forester |
Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5200 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 224 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 306 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1062 kg | 1633 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2530 mm |