1996 Dodge Ram vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 39 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Dodge Ram. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda BT-50. (206 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda BT-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Dodge Ram | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Ram | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1125 kg |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 3010 mm |
