1996 Dodge Ram vs. 2010 Nissan NP300
To start off, 2010 Nissan NP300 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan NP300 weights approximately 356 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan NP300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan NP300. (205 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan NP300.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 2010 Nissan NP300 | |
Make | Dodge | Nissan |
Model | Ram | NP300 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 141 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 205 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1442 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2960 mm |