1996 Dodge Ram vs. 2011 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 644 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Captiva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chevrolet Captiva. (221 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chevrolet Captiva.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 2011 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Dodge | Chevrolet |
Model | Ram | Captiva |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 134 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 221 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2710 mm |