1996 Dodge Ram vs. 2011 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-Z is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Honda CR-Z weights approximately 116 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-Z, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Honda CR-Z. (173 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Honda CR-Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Dodge Ram | 2011 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Dodge | Honda |
| Model | Ram | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1202 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2436 mm |
