1996 Dodge Ram vs. 2011 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2011 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Land Rover LR2 weights approximately 689 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Because 2011 Land Rover LR2 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Dodge Ram. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Land Rover LR2. (317 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Land Rover LR2. 2011 Land Rover LR2 has automatic transmission and 1996 Dodge Ram has manual transmission. 1996 Dodge Ram will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Land Rover LR2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 2011 Land Rover LR2 | |
Make | Dodge | Land Rover |
Model | Ram | LR2 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 230 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 317 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1775 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4496 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1908 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2659 mm |