1996 Dodge Ram vs. 2011 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2011 SsangYong Musso is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 939 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Because 2011 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Dodge Ram. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 SsangYong Musso. (250 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 SsangYong Musso.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 2011 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Dodge | SsangYong |
Model | Ram | Musso |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5200 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 250 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1062 kg | 2001 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2760 mm |