1996 Dodge Ram vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 705 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo XC60. (320 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo XC60.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Dodge | Volvo |
Model | Ram | XC60 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1791 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4627 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1891 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1713 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2774 mm |