1996 Dodge Stealth vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Stealth. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Stealth would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Dodge Stealth is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Dodge Stealth weights approximately 10 kg more than 2003 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1996 Dodge Stealth has manual transmission. 1996 Dodge Stealth will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Stealth | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Stealth | Ranger |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3010 mm |