1996 Donkervoort D8 vs. 1980 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 1996 Donkervoort D8 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,184 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Donkervoort D8 (138 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1980 Mercury Cougar. (116 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Donkervoort D8 should accelerate faster than 1980 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 760 kg more than 1996 Donkervoort D8.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mercury Cougar (264 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Donkervoort D8. (170 Nm @ 5250 RPM). This means 1980 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Donkervoort D8.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Donkervoort D8 1980 Mercury Cougar
Make Donkervoort Mercury
Model D8 Cougar
Year Released 1996 1980
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1796 cc 4184 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 138 HP 116 HP
Engine RPM 6750 RPM 3400 RPM
Torque 170 Nm 264 Nm
Torque RPM 5250 RPM 2200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 650 kg 1410 kg
Vehicle Length 3420 mm 4960 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1110 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2310 mm 2690 mm