1996 Eagle Vision vs. 1984 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1996 Eagle Vision is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Eagle Vision weights approximately 90 kg more than 1984 Mercury Cougar.
Because 1984 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Eagle Vision | 1984 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Eagle | Mercury |
Model | Vision | Cougar |
Year Released | 1996 | 1984 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1810 mm |