1996 Eagle Vision vs. 2001 MCC Smart
To start off, 2001 MCC Smart is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Eagle Vision (217 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 2001 MCC Smart. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 2001 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Eagle Vision weights approximately 900 kg more than 2001 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Eagle Vision | 2001 MCC Smart | |
Make | Eagle | MCC |
Model | Vision | Smart |
Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3200 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 2600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |