1996 Eagle Vision vs. 2009 Volvo S40
To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S40 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1996 Eagle Vision. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1996 Eagle Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Eagle Vision weights approximately 231 kg more than 2009 Volvo S40.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Eagle Vision | 2009 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Eagle | Volvo |
| Model | Vision | S40 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2700 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1339 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1780 mm |
