1996 Eagle Vision vs. 2010 BMW 123
To start off, 2010 BMW 123 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Eagle Vision (217 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2010 BMW 123. (202 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 2010 BMW 123. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Eagle Vision weights approximately 5 kg more than 2010 BMW 123. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 BMW 123 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 BMW 123. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Eagle Vision | 2010 BMW 123 | |
Make | Eagle | BMW |
Model | Vision | 123 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3200 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1748 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1411 mm |