1996 Eagle Vision vs. 2010 Ford Escape
To start off, 2010 Ford Escape is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Escape (265 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1996 Eagle Vision. (217 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1996 Eagle Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Escape weights approximately 325 kg more than 1996 Eagle Vision. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Ford Escape is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Eagle Vision. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Escape will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Eagle Vision | 2010 Ford Escape | |
Make | Eagle | Ford |
Model | Vision | Escape |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3200 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4717 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1702 mm |