1996 Eagle Vision vs. 2010 Kia Forte

To start off, 2010 Kia Forte is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Eagle Vision (217 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2010 Kia Forte. (173 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Forte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Eagle Vision weights approximately 326 kg more than 2010 Kia Forte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 2010 Kia Forte has manual transmission. 2010 Kia Forte will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Eagle Vision 2010 Kia Forte
Make Eagle Kia
Model Vision Forte
Year Released 1996 2010
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3200 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 217 HP 173 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1620 kg 1294 kg
Vehicle Length 5320 mm 4529 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1775 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1461 mm