1996 Eagle Vision vs. 2012 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1996 Eagle Vision. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1996 Eagle Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda CX-7 weights approximately 148 kg more than 1996 Eagle Vision. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Eagle Vision | 2012 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Eagle | Mazda |
Model | Vision | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 244 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1718 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4681 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1646 mm |