1996 Eagle Vision vs. 2012 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2012 Nissan GT-R is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Nissan GT-R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan GT-R (530 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 313 more horse power than 1996 Eagle Vision. (217 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan GT-R should accelerate faster than 1996 Eagle Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan GT-R weights approximately 117 kg more than 1996 Eagle Vision. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Nissan GT-R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Eagle Vision. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan GT-R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Eagle Vision | 2012 Nissan GT-R | |
Make | Eagle | Nissan |
Model | Vision | GT-R |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3200 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 530 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1737 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4671 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1369 mm |