1996 Ferrari 512 TR vs. 2008 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ferrari 512 TR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ferrari 512 TR would be higher. At 4,943 cc, 1996 Ferrari 512 TR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ferrari 512 TR weights approximately 220 kg more than 2008 Fiat Bravo.
Because 1996 Ferrari 512 TR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ferrari 512 TR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ferrari 512 TR (501 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Fiat Bravo. (206 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1996 Ferrari 512 TR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ferrari 512 TR | 2008 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Ferrari | Fiat |
Model | 512 TR | Bravo |
Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4943 cc | 1368 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 422 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 501 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2610 mm |