1996 Fiat 131 vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat 131 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Fiat 131 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Fiat 131 (113 HP) has 43 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Fiat 131 should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Fiat 131 weights approximately 281 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Fiat 131 (167 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1996 Fiat 131 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Fiat 131 | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Fiat | MCC |
Model | 131 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1025 kg | 744 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 1810 mm |