1996 Fiat Armadillo vs. 1960 Hudson Metropolitan
To start off, 1996 Fiat Armadillo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Hudson Metropolitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Hudson Metropolitan would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 1996 Fiat Armadillo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Fiat Armadillo (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1960 Hudson Metropolitan. (47 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Armadillo should accelerate faster than 1960 Hudson Metropolitan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Fiat Armadillo weights approximately 556 kg more than 1960 Hudson Metropolitan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Fiat Armadillo (200 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Hudson Metropolitan. (100 Nm). This means 1996 Fiat Armadillo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Hudson Metropolitan. 1996 Fiat Armadillo has automatic transmission and 1960 Hudson Metropolitan has manual transmission. 1960 Hudson Metropolitan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Fiat Armadillo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Fiat Armadillo | 1960 Hudson Metropolitan | |
Make | Fiat | Hudson |
Model | Armadillo | Metropolitan |
Year Released | 1996 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1487 cc |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 100 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 818 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2170 mm |