1996 Fiat Armadillo vs. 1978 Volvo 265
To start off, 1996 Fiat Armadillo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Volvo 265 (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Volvo 265 should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Volvo 265 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Volvo 265 (218 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (200 Nm). This means 1978 Volvo 265 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. 1996 Fiat Armadillo has automatic transmission and 1978 Volvo 265 has manual transmission. 1978 Volvo 265 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Fiat Armadillo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Fiat Armadillo | 1978 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Fiat | Volvo |
Model | Armadillo | 265 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2664 cc |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 218 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1404 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2660 mm |