1996 Fiat Armadillo vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1996 Fiat Armadillo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 1996 Fiat Armadillo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Fiat Armadillo (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1982 Opel Ascona. (74 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Armadillo should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Fiat Armadillo weights approximately 454 kg more than 1982 Opel Ascona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Fiat Armadillo (200 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Ascona. (102 Nm). This means 1996 Fiat Armadillo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Fiat Armadillo | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Fiat | Opel |
Model | Armadillo | Ascona |
Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1297 cc |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 102 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 920 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2640 mm |