1996 Fiat Armadillo vs. 1983 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1996 Fiat Armadillo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 1996 Fiat Armadillo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Fiat Armadillo (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1983 Mitsubishi Sigma. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Armadillo should accelerate faster than 1983 Mitsubishi Sigma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Fiat Armadillo weights approximately 304 kg more than 1983 Mitsubishi Sigma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Fiat Armadillo (200 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mitsubishi Sigma. (118 Nm). This means 1996 Fiat Armadillo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Fiat Armadillo | 1983 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Fiat | Mitsubishi |
Model | Armadillo | Sigma |
Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1597 cc |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 118 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1070 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2520 mm |