1996 Fiat Armadillo vs. 1983 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1996 Fiat Armadillo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1983 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Toyota Celica (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Fiat Armadillo weights approximately 194 kg more than 1983 Toyota Celica.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Toyota Celica (215 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (200 Nm). This means 1983 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Armadillo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Fiat Armadillo | 1983 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Fiat | Toyota |
| Model | Armadillo | Celica |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 200 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1180 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2640 mm |
