1996 Fiat Armadillo vs. 2000 Jaguar XKA
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Armadillo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Armadillo would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 360 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 426 kg more than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 643 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (200 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. 1996 Fiat Armadillo has automatic transmission and 2000 Jaguar XKA has manual transmission. 2000 Jaguar XKA will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Fiat Armadillo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Fiat Armadillo | 2000 Jaguar XKA | |
Make | Fiat | Jaguar |
Model | Armadillo | XKA |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4399 cc |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 466 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 843 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2590 mm |