1996 Fiat Armadillo vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2002 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Armadillo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Armadillo would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (112 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 226 kg more than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (200 Nm). This means 2002 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. 1996 Fiat Armadillo has automatic transmission and 2002 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2002 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Fiat Armadillo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Fiat Armadillo | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Armadillo | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1996 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2184 cc |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 270 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1600 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2540 mm |