1996 Fiat Armadillo vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Armadillo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Armadillo would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (307 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 414 kg more than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (374 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (200 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Armadillo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Fiat Armadillo | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Fiat | Cadillac |
| Model | Armadillo | CTS |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3564 cc |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 307 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 200 Nm | 374 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1788 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2890 mm |
