1996 Fiat Brava vs. 1974 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1996 Fiat Brava is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,563 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Nissan Cedric (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Brava. (75 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Brava. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 144 kg more than 1996 Fiat Brava. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1974 Nissan Cedric (216 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Brava. (147 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1974 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Brava.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Fiat Brava | 1974 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Fiat | Nissan |
| Model | Brava | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1910 cc | 2563 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1176 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |
