1996 Fiat Brava vs. 1979 Mazda 323
To start off, 1996 Fiat Brava is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Fiat Brava is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Fiat Brava weights approximately 366 kg more than 1979 Mazda 323.
Because 1979 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Brava, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Fiat Brava | 1979 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Fiat | Mazda |
| Model | Brava | 323 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1910 cc | 985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1176 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2320 mm |
