1996 Fiat Brava vs. 1988 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1996 Fiat Brava is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Brava. (79 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Brava.
Because 1988 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Fiat Brava. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1988 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1996 Fiat Brava has manual transmission. 1996 Fiat Brava will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1988 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Fiat Brava | 1988 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Brava | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1988 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1369 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1750 mm |
