1996 Fiat Brava vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Brava. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Brava would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Fiat Brava is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Brava. (75 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Brava. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 32 kg more than 1996 Fiat Brava. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Brava. (147 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Brava. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1996 Fiat Brava has manual transmission. 1996 Fiat Brava will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Fiat Brava | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Brava | Equator |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1176 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3260 mm |
