1996 Fiat Brava vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Brava. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Brava would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Fiat Brava (102 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Brava should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 255 kg more than 1996 Fiat Brava.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Brava. (140 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Brava. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 1996 Fiat Brava has manual transmission. 1996 Fiat Brava will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Fiat Brava | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
| Make | Fiat | Mazda |
| Model | Brava | CU-X |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1579 cc | 1970 cc |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 80 L |
