1996 Fiat Brava vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Brava. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Brava would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Fiat Brava is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Brava. (75 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Brava. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Fiat Brava weights approximately 736 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Brava, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Fiat Brava | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Fiat | Westfield |
Model | Brava | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1176 kg | 440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2320 mm |