1996 Fiat Duna vs. 1958 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1996 Fiat Duna is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,581 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Fiat Duna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Fiat Duna (86 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Duna should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Ford 12 M weights approximately 10 kg more than 1996 Fiat Duna.
Because 1958 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Duna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Fiat Duna | 1958 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Duna | 12 M |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1581 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 885 kg | 895 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2500 mm |
