1996 Fiat Duna vs. 1979 Pontiac Trans Am
To start off, 1996 Fiat Duna is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Pontiac Trans Am. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Pontiac Trans Am would be higher. At 6,555 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Pontiac Trans Am (220 HP) has 134 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Duna. (86 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Pontiac Trans Am should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Duna.
Because 1979 Pontiac Trans Am is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Pontiac Trans Am. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Duna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Pontiac Trans Am (434 Nm) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Duna. (141 Nm). This means 1979 Pontiac Trans Am will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Duna.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Fiat Duna | 1979 Pontiac Trans Am | |
| Make | Fiat | Pontiac |
| Model | Duna | Trans Am |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1581 cc | 6555 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 220 HP |
| Torque | 141 Nm | 434 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 104.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 95.3 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2750 mm |
