1996 Fiat Duna vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1996 Fiat Duna is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,581 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Fiat Duna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Fiat Duna (86 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Duna should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Fiat Duna weights approximately 115 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Fiat Duna (141 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Fiat Duna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Fiat Duna | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Fiat | Zastava |
| Model | Duna | 102 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 1581 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 141 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 885 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2160 mm |
