1996 Fiat Legram vs. 1966 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1996 Fiat Legram is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Legram. (145 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Legram.
Because 1966 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Legram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Fiat Legram (191 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1996 Fiat Legram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Fiat Legram | 1966 Ford GT 40 | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Legram | GT 40 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 191 Nm | 85 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 95.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.7 mm | 72.9 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1040 mm |