1996 Fiat Legram vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Fiat Legram is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,996 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Fiat Legram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Fiat Legram (145 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (62 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Legram should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Fiat Legram (191 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1996 Fiat Legram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Fiat Legram | 1991 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Fiat | Renault |
| Model | Legram | Clio |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1870 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 191 Nm | 118 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75.7 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 23.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1400 mm |
