1996 Fiat Legram vs. 1999 Ford Puma
To start off, 1999 Ford Puma is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Legram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Legram would be higher. At 1,996 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Fiat Legram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Fiat Legram (145 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1999 Ford Puma. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Legram should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Fiat Legram (191 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Puma. (125 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1996 Fiat Legram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Fiat Legram | 1999 Ford Puma | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Legram | Puma |
Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 191 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.7 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1350 mm |