1996 Fiat Legram vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Legram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Legram would be higher. At 1,996 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Fiat Legram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Fiat Legram (145 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Legram should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 2003 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Legram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Fiat Legram (191 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1996 Fiat Legram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Fiat Legram | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Fiat | MCC |
Model | Legram | Smart |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 191 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1200 mm |