1996 Fiat Palio vs. 1964 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1996 Fiat Palio is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 60 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 190 kg more than 1996 Fiat Palio.
Because 1964 Nissan Cedric is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Fiat Palio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Nissan Cedric (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Palio. (80 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1964 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Palio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Fiat Palio | 1964 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Fiat | Nissan |
| Model | Palio | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 994 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 80 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2540 mm |
