1996 Fiat Palio vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1996 Fiat Palio is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Palio. (60 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Palio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 415 kg more than 1996 Fiat Palio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Palio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Fiat Palio | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Palio | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 994 cc | 2782 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 40 L |
