1996 Fiat Palio vs. 1993 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1996 Fiat Palio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Fiat Palio (107 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1993 Ford Tempo. (96 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Palio should accelerate faster than 1993 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Ford Tempo weights approximately 190 kg more than 1996 Fiat Palio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Ford Tempo (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Palio. (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1993 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Palio.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Fiat Palio | 1993 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Palio | Tempo |
Year Released | 1996 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1581 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 171 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.4 mm | 93.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67.5 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2540 mm |