1996 Fiat Palio vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Palio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Palio would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 368 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Palio. (92 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Palio.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Palio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Palio. (127 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Palio.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Fiat Palio | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Palio | ST 460 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1581 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2580 mm |