1996 Fiat Palio vs. 2000 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2000 Smart ForFour is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Palio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Palio would be higher. At 1,581 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Fiat Palio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Smart ForFour (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Palio. (107 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Palio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Smart ForFour has automatic transmission and 1996 Fiat Palio has manual transmission. 1996 Fiat Palio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Smart ForFour will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Fiat Palio | 2000 Smart ForFour | |
Make | Fiat | Smart |
Model | Palio | ForFour |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1581 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.3 seconds | 9.8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 47 L |