1996 Fiat Palio vs. 2009 Mazda 3

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Palio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Palio would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Palio. (92 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Palio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 575 kg more than 1996 Fiat Palio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Palio. (127 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Palio.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Fiat Palio 2009 Mazda 3
Make Fiat Mazda
Model Palio 3
Year Released 1996 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1581 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 92 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 127 Nm 183 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 975 kg 1550 kg
Vehicle Length 3740 mm 4510 mm
Vehicle Width 1620 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2370 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 48 L 55 L