1996 Fiat Panda vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Panda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Panda would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 656 kg more than 1996 Fiat Panda.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Panda. (58 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Panda.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Fiat Panda | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Fiat | Mini |
| Model | Panda | Countryman |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 58 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 58 mm | 85 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 684 kg | 1340 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 4097 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1993 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 47 L |
